Evaluation of Plastic Waste Management Methods Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Tool – AHP

نویسندگان

چکیده

The immense utilization of plastics has produced an enormous amount plastic waste. So, basically there is a necessity created for proper method waste management. As, we know the most essential part our life and used in every application very versatile portfolio everywhere from industries to households. We can say that use inevitable. In present time adoption sustainability principles including selection best recycling process important optimum resources. As are various management strategies available, their prioritization on basis several criteria like health, safety, environment impact, etc. relevant stakeholders involved this sector . Main objective as apply by using different multi- decision making conduct analysis which based hierarchical structure multi-level methods. AHP approach (MCDM) tool adopt study depict suitable Plastic Waste Management industries. identification literature review expert discussions was done initiated. Further, weightage ranking available methods were AHP. Four commonly alternatives evaluated findings reveal alternative. This will help possible techniques By deep be able find out gives us clarity it takes attributes reach result. technique inter-related Operation Research subject. From paper conclude Incineration, landfilling, Mechanical Recycling Road filling , comes should mainly utilized further.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management

As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously.  Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...

متن کامل

Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making

In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...

متن کامل

Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators

This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach

The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Advances in transdisciplinary engineering

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2352-751X', '2352-7528']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/atde220780